From 2fdba4f2178a106418f48b7fd26d48b91aff58b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julia Lange Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 17:00:40 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] content, change overrides to union from object Technically union is more apt here, because the object will have an associated schema, it's just unclear what the type for that schema should be. For instance, does tvdb own the schema under their own domain? or is it more apt for my.spoor to control it? Going forward I will use an appropriate tld from the owner of the schema. This should allow adoption from external providers later if lexicon does take off. --- my/spoor/content/external.json | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/my/spoor/content/external.json b/my/spoor/content/external.json index a3e0054..93176ec 100644 --- a/my/spoor/content/external.json +++ b/my/spoor/content/external.json @@ -25,9 +25,9 @@ } }, "overrides": { - "type": "object", + "type": "union", "description": "User defined overrides for the returned content", - "properties": {} + "refs": [] } } }